Send As SMS

CRUISE LINKS (with Gary Bembridge)

Saturday, February 26, 2005

ARCADIA NEARS COMPLETITION VIDEO

P&O posted a video on their site of the Arcadia that we are going on in July. It is called Arcadia nears complettion - although from the video it looks like a lot to be done!!!! But not long to go before the April launch date!

At the end of the video there is a shot of what I think are the suites that we will be in.

This link should launch the video (as long as they keep it on their servers at this address!):

mms://wm.webstreaminghost.com/po/Arcadia0205.wmv

Friday, February 18, 2005

Four charged over alleged QE2 breach


Police have charged a group of people over an alleged security breach on board one of the world's largest passenger liners while it was docked in Fremantle. (Australia)

The Queen Elizabeth II (QE2) sailed into the port city yesterday morning.
The four people are alleged to have illegally boarded the ship about 9:30pm yesterday, after earlier being refused access.

Police say the two men and two women were detected in one of the ship's bar areas.
Security staff, police and Customs were called and the group was subsequently charged.
One of them, a 26-year-old Padbury man, has also been charged with stealing a motor vehicle, burglary, stealing from a vessel, assault and disorderly conduct.

The four will appear in court next week.

The QE2 is due to leave for Esperance today Posted by Hello

Monday, February 14, 2005

NEWS ON QUEEN VICTORIA


MK posted this to the Yahoo Queen Victoria Group: "New to this group. I was on QE2 for Christmas and spoke to some of
the officers regarding QV. Here is the scoop:

QV will enter service Jan '08. QE2 will do the 2007 and 2008 world cruises and be pulled out of service sometime in 2009.

The designers of QV have gone back to the drawing broad to make her around 90,000 tons, double hull and have the bowlines of QE2 and QM2.
This is all for crossing purposes. She will still have the superstructure of the Holland Amer. design. I also understand that her decor will be more in lines of the British stated elegance of QE2 and with take around 1300-1800 passengers.

I hope that Cunard learns from the QM imperfections and will improve on the QV design." Interesting is the pic on this posting of an old picture of the QV when it was due in 2005 and before this ship became the P&O Arcadia (the one we are going on in July), and also they are have invited travel agents and regular P&O cruisers to have a tour of in April...
Posted by Hello

Sunday, February 13, 2005

LIVING ON THE QE2 - FROM NEW YORK TIMES


Crossing the World in Her Apartment
By JOSEPH P. FRIED Published: February 13, 2005

Beatrice Muller traded in two states for the seven seas, and she is still counting the rewards.
In 1999, Mrs. Muller and her husband of 57 years, Robert Muller, were on the latest of several world cruises on the Queen Elizabeth 2 when Mr. Muller, who was 85, died aboard ship. The Mullers, who lived in Bound Brook, N.J., and had a second home in Myrtle Beach, S.C., had so enjoyed the cruises that they had planned to spend all of 2000 on the QE2, taking every one of its voyages that year.

At a son's suggestion, Mrs. Muller went forward with the plan, solo - and, along the way, decided there was no reason for her to leave the ship. Officials of the Cunard Line, its owner, were amenable, and since January 2000, a small fourth-deck cabin on the fabled ocean liner has been Mrs. Muller's permanent home, with her payment of about $5,000 a month also covering meals and housekeeping.

Mrs. Muller, now 85, whose unusual living arrangement has drawn newspaper and television attention, has sold off virtually everything she and her husband owned, including the Bound Brook home, though she has kept the Myrtle Beach property. Before they retired, the couple had an engineering consulting business.

Though Mrs. Muller's cabin is a mere 10 feet by 10 feet and windowless, she feels "no sense of confinement," she said in an e-mail message from the ship last week. The novelty of her life as the only noncrew resident on a huge ocean liner has not worn off, she said, even after five years.
"I plan to be a passenger on this beautiful ship or, if necessary, another, until I am bored or dead, and don't expect that to be for a long, long time," she wrote.

"QE2 is a small village traveling about the world," she said. "Everything is here for one's needs." She cited shops, entertainment, cultural events and medical facilities. She has made friends among the crew members and regularly returning passengers, she said, and her two sons periodically book cruises "to sail with me."

Mrs. Muller sent her e-mail message on Wednesday, as the QE2 was about to leave Sydney, Australia, on a cruise that began in New York on Jan. 3 and is to end in Southampton, England, on April 16.

"When QE2 is in port, I get off and go somewhere," she said. The voyage so far has included the Bahamas, a run through the Panama Canal and stops across the Pacific, with Japan, Thailand, India, the Middle East and countries in Europe among the places to come.
"It would be very hard," Mrs. Muller said, "to pick up life on land again." Posted by Hello

Saturday, February 12, 2005

EASYCRUISE ROOMS ARE....


the scary prison style rooms on the easyCruise ship....... not for us I dont think! Posted by Hello

EASYCRUISE LAUNCHES.. NOT QUITE THE QE2


This is what the site www.easycruise.com says announcing the launch, The latest spin off from the low cost airline empire:

"The idea is to offer a unique holiday experience to independently minded travelers in their 20's, 30's and 40's. During the summer of 2005, our first ship, named easyCruiseOne (see our ships ) will be based in the French and the Italian Rivieras , one of the most glamorous parts of the world, known globally as the playground for the rich and famous.

Unlike traditional cruising, the ship will stay in port in the afternoon and the evening to encourage people to have fun ashore and sail in the early hours of each morning for the next destination. The flexible one week allow you to embark and depart at any port on the route provided you stay on board at least two nights. " Posted by Hello

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

SHARES IN CARNIVAL (CUNARD OWNER)

I forgot to post a few weeks ago that I ahve bought soem shares in Carnival, the company that owns amoung many others, the Cunard line.

I bought the shares listed on the London Stock Exchnage. Their share price has been on a very steady and strong upward trend over the last few years. I did not buy a lot, but always good to have shares in things you have passion about!!!

Monday, February 07, 2005

FINAL WORD ON CELEBRITY VS QM2


BMCT wrote this interesting wrap up of Celebrity vs Cunard... and makes a point that I had thought (around best to go on a crossing versus cruise.. which is our plan!).

He wrote; " ..Wasn't the ship (QM2) beautiful! I think Celebrity and QM2 attract about the same crowd--with the Queen being a bit more "stylish" and dressy. The formal nights saw people in much dressier dress than we have seen on Celebrity. We saw only one man in blue jeans, and he was not allowed into the dining room, where on Celebrity he would have been. We didn't seem to run into some of the snobbishness we saw on Crystal.

This cruise also had a younger crowd than many Cunard cruises, with several families with children. And it was the most "international" of any we have been on. ..........The public areas are quite spacious, the lounge entertainment more to our liking than on X. Cabins about the same as on Summit, with the big exception being the hair dryers being bolted into the drawer under the TV and hard to use on the QM2....

..........One of our biggest complaints was pricing -- on the QM2 you are paying for the "name." Welcome aboard photos are $27.50! The per diem is quite a bit higher than on Celebrity, and quite frankly, I'm not sure it's worth it. The entertainment is better, the public room decor more lavish, but still, the per diem is closer to that of Crystal/RSSC than Celebrity. Plus, they have their hand out all the time. Crystal now includes soft drinks in their pricing, while QM2 doesn't. RSSC includes a bar set-up in the suite, QM2 doesn't. RSSC also includes all tips, wine and liquor in the dining room at dinner, while QM2 doesn't.
Would we sail on her again? For a crossing, yes. For a cruise, not sure. Posted by Hello

CELEBRITY VS QM2... CONTINUED


Further to the posting about how these 2 comapre, this was a posting by FANG who ahs a lot of experience with Celebrity - and really liked QM2:

" I have just returned from the QM2 (Jan 29 cruise). My wife and I have been on Celebrity 13 times. On Celebrity we usually book a suite. We have been in all of the different suites on Celebrity, except the Celebrity Suite (due to no balcony).

On the QM 2 we booked a B2 stateroom. I will say that it would be hard to compare the suites on Celebrity to the Princess/Queens grill suites on Cunard. I say this because of the Grill rooms that a suite passenger would have access to on Cunard. When we travel with my daughters we have booked connecting concerge class cabins.

I would say that the interiors of the QM2 are much better than any Celebrity ship. I was amazed at how stunning the public areas are on the QM2. We loved the Golden Lion, Chart Room and Sir Samuels Wine bar. The major draw back about the QM2 is the pool areas. We spent time at the Terrace pool, and found it very complicated just to get to. Our cabin was on deck 11. The only way to get to the Terrace pool was for us to go to deck 12 then walk down three flights of outside steps to deck 8 or go to deck 7 and climb up outside steps to deck 8. There is a walkway on deck 8 but one must go through Todd English.One nice thing about the pool areas on QM2 is that their Hot Tubs are actually hot!! Not so on Celebrity were they are warm at best and most of the time cool. I also believe that QM2 are heated alittle and they are fresh water. Not so on Celebrity.

The food I thought was better on QM2. Not much so but still a little better. There is much more choices on QM2. At lunch on Celebrity all lines at the Buffet area serve the same items. On QM2 the Kings Court has four different options. It was very nice. QM2 did not have waiters to carry trays and find empy tables in the Kings Court like they do in the buffet area on Celebrity. The service is about the same on Celebrity as QM2 with one major exception, being the dinning room.

Our service at dinner was poor. Perhaps the worst I have ever had on 20 cruises (even American Hawaii was better). Our waiter did not even introduce himself. Perhaps it is because all tips are added to your bill and they don't think they have to be good. I do not know.If the QM2 did 7 night cruises again out of the Florida we would cruise on her again in a minute. Hopefully that will happen in the winter of 2007.

My opinion is that the two lines are very comparable. Celebrity has the edge in service (just because our waiter and asst. waiter were very poor). QM2 has an edge in food (just because there are so many choices).I am sure that in the suites on QM2 the service and food would be much better than Celebrity. However, for the money I do not know if it would be worth it for me to travel that way."Posted by Hello

CUNARD VS CELEBRITY


As you will have seen, we cancelled our planned Xmas 05 trip on the Celebrity Line - deciding after watching a numnber of films and looking again at our Qe2 trip pics and also the DVd of the QM2 that we will go on the QM2 instead in 2006.

Interestingly, at the same time someone posted on the Cunard boards on CruiseCritic a question asking how a Sky Suite on Celebrity (what we had booked) compared to the QM2 QG experience.

Here was a posting that replied to that:

" Whilst I have not had a suite on Celebrity's Summit when I took a Caribbean cruise on her in Oct/Nov'03 in a superior balcony cabin, I have travelled mainly in QG grade cabins on QE2 and would see that whilst the food & service were both very commendable onboard Summit, the QE2's Queens Grill experience is a hard act to follow and has the edge over Celebrity.

Having said this the ambience in the main Restaurant with classical music from the orchestra is a nice touch and you dont' get this on QE2! The dining wait staff on Summit too were 1st class and I would say comparable to the QG wait staff and very anxious to please and help with special requests / particular favourite dishes! As were the cabin stewards who could not do enough for the passengers!

The 'Millennium' class ship itself was simply stunning!I particularly liked the bar at the aft of the ship that was outside and where guitar music was played nightly - it was great to sit at the bar enjoying a drink and hearing the waves in the background.Having said this the leisure facilities were second to none on Summit, which sadly are not very good on QE2! Why they ever reduced the 4 pools on QE2 to just 2 now amazes me and is a great shame!

Interestingly the night club 'Revelations' on Summit was very poorly frequented especially when the Yacht Club on QE2 is usually packed out most evenings / early hours of the morning! Whilst I would not hesitate booking Summit again, the Cunard style and unique atmosphere & always very interesting mix of International passengers will bring me back to QE2/ Cunard.I hope the above, whilst off topic a bit, is useful!Kind Regs,RJMS74"Posted by Hello

Saturday, February 05, 2005

CELEBRITY XMAS CRUISE - CANCELLED

We have decided to cancel the 9 night Eastern Caribbean trip that we booked on the Celebrity Century ship. And have booked to go to Zimbabwe to the Victoria Falls instead, and go the Cunard QM2 (probably transatlantic) in 2006 instead.

Our decision was driven by these things:

1) We watched the DVD that arrived from Cunard last night. The sent another brochure that we seem to have received 3 times, but this one had a DVD in with 2 short films on them. An overall Cunard one that has the QE2 and QM2 in equal amounts, and another on the QM2 transatlantic. Seeing the Cunard ships made us realise that we have such an affinity for Cunard that we really want to go on the QM2.

2) We watched last night the TV series form the UK of a few years ago called "The Cruise". It was the one that had the singer Jane McDonald as one of the features - and in fact made her quite a big personality in the UK after it. It was set on one of the Celebrity Ships like the Century in the Caribbean. We realised that the type of people and type of cruise it was, was just not really us.

3) As we were planning to use air miles to get to the States, we realised that we cannot get direct to Miami as they lock so many dates out as this is a peak time for trips there, and so it would mean going via JFK or Atlanta and 2 flights and all the hassles.

We looked at other options and decided to go to Zimbabwe on Airmiles, and do a special Queens Grill trip on the QM2 next year... and if I have my way it will be one of the early Transatlantics (and then probably go to Las Vegas for a week after that)....

CUNARD FUTURE CONTINUED....


EROLLER posted these thoughts on the thread on CruiseCritic about Cunard future as a brand and to what degree Carnival will build and keep Cunard distinct:

"I think you make some valid points. The question has been raised within the cruise industry and insider publications of just how successful Cunard is?

Cunard has assumed a much less visible position since the introduction of QM2, and no doubt had Cunard been wildly successful it would have not been folded into the Princess brand.

Apparently there are only two dedicated Cunard executives at Cunard now, and the rest of the staff is shared with Princess Cruises. Some industry insiders are wondering if Cunard can maintain it's unique character or will it eventually be totally integrated?

Meanwhile the rest of the large Carnival brands are ordering new ships like crazy ... Princess, Costa, P&O, Carnival, Holland America, and even smaller AIDA. Unfortunately Cunard had it's only ship on order (QV) deferred to a later date and the original given to another brand. I guess there is no pressing need for Cunard to have additional tonnage.

I think once QV is introduced in 2007 we will see QE2 leave the fleet. I have a feeling Cunard will remain a small, two ship brand for the foreseeable future. One thing is certain regarding QE2, once she outlives her usefulness to Carnival Corp. she will be gone. There is no love lost within Carnival Corp. for old ships that are expensive to operate. This has been proven time and time again." Posted by Hello

CUNARD UNDER CARNIVAL - THE ISSUES


Quite often in the boards, there are postings where people are either concerned or even hostile about what Carnival is or will do to the Cunard offer.

Here are some thoughts, followed by what I had posted:

JOHNEZ: "As all of you know, at this time Cunard only has the QE2 and QM2 in its fleet. Two ships. Wow. But you see many other companies like P&O which have far more... let's say, 8-10 or more. Why is there so little interest going to Cunard? Sure, they're getting Queen Victoria.. but she's not a real ocean liner and she's only to replace QE2 due to Solas regulations (I think.)Is it because Cunard is more formal than the other lines, and thus she carries fewer passengers? Or do they think that Cunard doesn't have the potential to grow into something more popular?"

MUFI: "Cunard is now just another marketing name, trading on its British heritage and aimed at that section of the US market that thinks "British" is something special. I don't think that the fleet will expand much more because there will be nothing special about the ship offerings (except the transatlantics QM2 and QE2, long may she sail) that can't be got from other lines at more realistic prices."

MY THOUGHTS: " think what they are doing with Cunard is quite interesting, and I guess within the portfolio of brands that Carnival has it does make some sense.

The one advantage of Cunard being owned by Carnival is that the financial security is strong.

Also to keep growth they need to be making sure that each of the lines they have are different and offer different things to different people - or they will just end up competng with themselves. Having a small fleet will be part of keeping the exclusiveness of Cunard. The Cunard brand has such a rich history and is seen as a luxury name, linked with style, grace, and yes "Britishness".

One big feature is the trans-atlantic element to the history and the name. And I think that keeping a strong transatlantic element to Cunard will be the thing they push. It is interesting that they have the "Victoria" coming that is not designed for that. But with the sheer size and numbers they need on the QM2 there is probably not the potential to have more than one.

The one thing that they are probably not doing so well, is by making the Victoria on the Vista hull base as it will look like many other ships. Whereas Cunard ships are usually more "tailor made". It may be - and time will tell - the reason they switched the original ship to P&O and started building a new one to be the Victoria as they understood that this ship needs to be more unique, more Cunard, more different to the others. I think this suggests that Carnival marketing may be more determined to protect and nurture the Cunard brand than try and make it more like others.

One thing I am sure they are wrestling with as they learn about the QM2, is that they underestimated the degree to which the Caribbean in winter was going to be such a price driven market as all lines have piled in there. They need to find a role in Winter that can fill the ship - and appear more exclusive."

Posted by Hello

THE DEBATE ON QE2 CONDITION CONTINUES


The debate continues on the CruiseCritc boards about the state of the QE2 and what is next for the ship - most blame Cunard's owners (carnival):

IDTDAVID: "well, we just got of the Christmas cruise and I have to be honest - the ship is tired. It was my 10th voyage on the QE2 and I am sad to say it was probably my last. Let's face it, the ship is old. It is still elegant, but not as much as it used to be. We refered to our cabin (queens grill) as "Shabby Chic". In it's day it was surely top drawer. It would be very hard to find a cabin that size on a newer ship, but I think I would trade size for comfort.The air conditioning in our cabin and throughout the ship was unpredictable.The staff was better than they were last year, but I feel many of the old timers are burnt out and just waiting for their pensions. So, I would opt for the QM2 for a crossing & Crystal for a cruise.Thats just my opinion"

WINCHESTER: "The ship can still work and be nice to travel on if THEY keep up the repairs. And at this time THEY aren't. When I was on for the latest last trans, the carpets were worn on many areas. The chairs in the Chart Room, and I assume other places, since others mentioned it as well, were losing their covering. Doors in my cabin flapped back and forth because they didn't shut tightly anymore. And then there was the power failure on new years. Stuff like that will happen to an old ship, but that may be a hazzard if something bigger fails."

RICHARD S disagees saying : "I do not know who you have been talking to, but I was on the ship on her December 2004 crossing, and her "state of repair" was excellent. I did not see worn carpeting, nor did I have any trouble with plumbing or A/C. What I did experience was the last real trans-Atlantic ocean liner managing beautifully in Force 8 gales, with 10 to 12 meter waves, without ever reducing speed. It was a wonderful crossing. QE 2 is the last of her kind, a descendant of the Aquitania and Mauretania.

The crew was attentive, the food excellent, and nobody on board was whining about the lack of a climbing wall or the absence of chrome fixtures or strobe lights. People wore tuxedos without referring to them as "Monkey Suits" or complaining about the fact that there were no "denim days" on the ship. If you want a gleaming, Las Vegas hotel avec water, try the Queen Mary 2. You'll love it, and will never be confronted by the possibility you may find a part of the ship that actually looks like... a ship. Jake, you have a couple of years, max, to be one of the last people to experience a classic trans-Atlantic ocean liner, provided you book on the QE2. After that, it's the "Ceasar's Palace on a Hull", courtesy of the Princess Cruise Lines. Do me a favor: book the Queen Mary 2. More room for me and my cigar in the Chart Room on the QE 2."

STOWAYA2k (as always!) does sum up the view of the QE2 fans by writing: "QE2 is an easy target because of her age, and her iconic status. It's human nature to want to trash and target an icon. We see it every day. It's the same as when a star athlete has a bad day, when an actor stars in a bad movie, people are so quick to gleefully trumpet the end of their career.How sad when people are ready to turn their backs. Fair weather friends?

If you want bright, shiny, sparkly new, don't sail QE2. If your style is a brand new mini van rather than a classic Mustang, don't sail QE2. If you strive for that large cookie cutter tract house with the faux facade instead of the older elegance of the historic district of town, don't sail QE2. If you have no sense of adventure, of living for the moment, if you don't understand that newer and bigger does not necessarily mean better, don't sail QE2. If insignificant, minor issues don't ruin your day, if you prefer the real thing to a pretender, then QE2 is still there, waiting for you.Sure, there are only a few years left. Yes, her glory years are over. But QE2 still has something that QM2, and no other ship will ever have. Actually, the internet is ripe with constant complaints about QM2, will she even ever have any glory years."

Posted by Hello

Thursday, February 03, 2005

MY BOOK - ASKING PEOPLE TO DO A SURVEY

I ahve decided - at last - to get down to writing a book. Well a series of books. Something that I ahve been saying I woudl do for ages and ages.

It is just that I have found the "idea" and thing that I want to do... and also the thing that maybe eventaully will mean I can travel about as a cruiseline guest speaker!!

I have been posting this message on a number of groups:

"This is kind of on topic...! I am starting some research for a book I am working on about at things people consider to be "icons" related to travel in all its forms (cruising included naturally!). It would be a great help if as many of you could do the survey and express your view. The list is quite long (around 50) and as I mentioned they are all transport or transportation related (e.g. 4 Cunard ships and some others there on the list) as well as some others.All the survey asks you to do is tick legend, idol, icon or don't know/ none of these. There is a definition of the terms legend, icon etc to help you.. The objective being to not think long and hard but just go down the list and tick what you first think....This is the link: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=41195840489Thanks if you get the time.... Very much appreciated!! Gary"


Tuesday, February 01, 2005

LIFE AS A CUNARD CHAP...


This article appeared on SPECTRUM ONLINE andout one of Cunard's people that made for great reading:

"Dale Gardener: The Modern Mariner

The Caribbean is always nice, and the Antarctic is interesting," Dale Gardener says. "Funny penguins.

"And the Amazon is quite good; no penguins there, of course, but it's got pink dolphins." Tall, soft-spoken, and British, Gardener is looking back over his 17-plus years with Cunard Line Ltd., of Valencia, Calif., the storied shipping concern, now part of Miami-based Carnival Corp.
As electrical superintendent of Cunard, Gardener oversees the electrical engineers on both the Queen Mary 2, the largest and most technically complex ocean liner ever built, and the Queen Elizabeth 2, the longest-serving ocean liner in Cunard's history.

Gardener epitomizes low-key; it's hard to picture him flustered, even in a job that is equal parts stress and adventure. He does admit to some tense moments during his first shipboard blackout as chief electrical officer on the QE2. "The backup generators come up, and you have to get all the systems up again. Then you have to find out what caused the blackout," he says. "It's normally quite relaxed, but if the blackout goes longer than 5 or 6 minutes, well, passengers start to worry."

The cruise industry is structured like the military, and Gardener climbed the ranks to reach his current position. After serving as a junior electrical officer on the QE2, he moved to chief electrical officer on the smaller Sea Goddess 2, then on to increasingly larger ships before taking on his current position last year.

Before Gardener got his first engineering job with Cunard, he had never been on a ship larger than a three-man sailing dinghy and had never traveled outside the UK. Born in Stourbridge, a small town that is as far as you can get from the sea and still be in England, Gardener attended a two-year technical school, and then went on to an electronics college in northern England, Wray Castle College, in Kendal, for two more years. It would have taken one more year of study to get a full-fledged engineering degree, but Gardener was ready to get to work. (He's now finishing up that degree via correspondence courses.)

When Gardener graduated in 1987, the economy in the UK was not exactly booming, and few companies were recruiting. Cunard, however, had contacted the college with two openings. Three weeks after graduation, he was walking up the gangplank of the QE2 as a junior electrical officer.

The life of a ship's engineer isn't like that of most other engineers. You spend about two months onboard working almost all the time. There are compensations, however. On a full-service passenger ship, you are freed from such mundane chores as cleaning, laundry, and cooking. Even better, crew typically receive about five consecutive weeks off, which you can spend in your home country, as a passenger onboard a ship, or in some exotic port of call. And as you climb the ranks, your shipboard accommodations go up with you. Senior officers on the QE2 get an elegantly furnished bedroom and a sitting room on one of the uppermost decks.

In his first job on the QE2, working under a six-month temporary contract, Gardener was putting in 14-hour days, seven days a week. He did well enough to be offered a full-time job. The QE2 usually traveled trans-Atlantic routes (a role now taken over by her successor, Queen Mary 2), often with such luminaries as Mick Jagger or David Bowie aboard. His favorite route was the world cruise, visiting New York City, the Caribbean, the Panama Canal, Mexico, Hawaii, Australia, Hong Kong, Thailand, Japan, South Africa, the Mediterranean, and back to the UK.
Though his second ship, the Sea Goddess 2, was much smaller, the move to chief electrical officer was a huge jump in status and responsibility. This ship typically carried 100 passengers on chartered Mediterranean voyages, and Gardener even attended the 1992 Barcelona Olympics, in Spain, when the Sea Goddess 2 was docked there as home for the Australian Olympic team. From the Sea Goddess 2, he moved to the Cunard Princess, also cruising the Mediterranean, then to the Cunard Sagafjord, a midsize ship that accommodated 600 passengers.

It was on the Sagafjord that he visited the Antarctic with an expedition team and film crew led by Jean-Michel Cousteau. The group had permits to land the expedition team on shore. Gardener and his engineering team stayed onboard, wrestling to get clean transmissions from the video cameras to shipboard displays so that passengers could view the local wildlife from the comfort of the ship.

After the Sagafjord, he returned to QE2, this time as chief electrical officer. Last year, he moved to Miami as electrical superintendent for the entire Cunard Line, then to Valencia when Cunard's headquarters was relocated.

On Queen Mary 2 and QE2, the most famous vessels in the cruise industry, the technical challenges are not just about keeping shipboard systems going. Queen Mary 2 itself is a triumph of electrical engineering, propelled by four 21.5-megawatt electric motors driven by electric generators that are in turn spun by diesel engines. The motors are mounted in huge pods beneath the ship; two of the pods move to change the ship's heading. The vessel is outfitted with computer controls that consult with Global Positioning System receivers to continually adjust the orientation of the pods. The huge ship is as much high-tech city as floating test bed. "We have huge amounts of equipment that have the serial number 1," Gardener says. He was involved in an early test of satellite communications for Comsat International, in McLean, Va., in the late 1980s, in several attempts to test interactive television in the early 1990s, and in the change from steam turbines to diesel-electric engines in 1987.

Gardener's work isn't always at sea. In 2003 he spent six months in Venice, Italy, supervising the installation of electrical systems on a ship that was to be Cunard's Queen Victoria but will now be P&O Cruises' Arcadia. (P&O, a sister cruise company based in Southampton, England, is also owned by Carnival.) He drew on his own blackout-recovery experiences to help redesign the power management systems. In the future, engineers on this ship will better be able to diagnose a blackout because the power network will automatically split itself into pieces after a failure, to isolate the problem.

Now in Valencia, he's busy unpacking boxes in his new office at Cunard's headquarters. One current challenge is investigating the possibility of putting in a complete cellphone system on Queen Mary 2 so that passengers will be able to use their own cellphones or a rented phone to call anywhere in the world through a satellite relay.

After 17 years on ships, Gardener was ready to try living on shore. "But I still get to spend time with the ships," he says, "so this job is ideal." " Posted by Hello